Banning for Selling - Site Information

BubblesofBeer · 10-12-2009, 04:35 PM

I understand that the classified section is buy at your own risk and I personally have never had any issues. But in reading the feedback thread today I noticed that there has been a few members who have stolen money from member. Received the payment and never sent the item.

I was wondering if the MODs would look into warning or banning for this. I think it shows the true side of a person and could be considered trolling to use the SOS classifieds and our large member base as a place to steal from.

Brandi · 10-13-2009, 04:17 PM

I would be totally on board with warning and/or banning for people who have proven to be problematic. If it's like a one time ordeal and there isn't any proof, that's one thing, and I don't think the mods should have to issue a ban or warning for 1 person's word. But if there are multiple instances, and especially proof, I really do think it should be given HEAVY consideration. I'd even personally support an immediate ban versus 3 separate warnings, if it seems like the person is really a scam artist. Of course on an individual basis for each situation, but I think this may discourage repeat offenders if they are not given a lot of chances.

+1

glass1/2full · 10-13-2009, 04:18 PM

I like this.

Kris · 10-13-2009, 04:18 PM

I also agree with this.

Charity · 10-13-2009, 04:19 PM

Originally Posted by LatteLove

I would be totally on board with warning and/or banning for people who have proven to be problematic. If it's like a one time ordeal and there isn't any proof, that's one thing, and I don't think the mods should have to issue a ban or warning for 1 person's word. But if there are multiple instances, and especially proof, I really do think it should be given HEAVY consideration. I'd even personally support an immediate ban versus 3 separate warnings, if it seems like the person is really a scam artist. Of course on an individual basis for each situation, but I think this may discourage repeat offenders if they are not given a lot of chances.

+1

I support this 100%

helloimkaley · 10-13-2009, 04:21 PM

Originally Posted by LatteLove

I would be totally on board with warning and/or banning for people who have proven to be problematic. If it's like a one time ordeal and there isn't any proof, that's one thing, and I don't think the mods should have to issue a ban or warning for 1 person's word. But if there are multiple instances, and especially proof, I really do think it should be given HEAVY consideration. I'd even personally support an immediate ban versus 3 separate warnings, if it seems like the person is really a scam artist. Of course on an individual basis for each situation, but I think this may discourage repeat offenders if they are not given a lot of chances.

+1

yesyesyes

Amber · 10-13-2009, 04:23 PM

Agree. I would hate to see anyone else lose money, Lord knows we don't make that much.

blahblahcarnes · 10-13-2009, 04:34 PM

I aggree

Saigon · 10-13-2009, 04:38 PM

I thought there was a Banned From Selling list?

It had Truzbabygirl, Sweetness and LuvnMatthew on it...

ThatKid · 10-13-2009, 04:42 PM

with all of this...there are some that take FULL advantage of this, and should be banned for it.

10-12-2009, 04:35 PM	#1 (permalink)
BubblesofBeer Where the sun and the sand and the surf meets the land Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: WeHa <3 Posts: 7,540 Classifieds: (0) Activity: 40% Longevity: 16%	Banning for Selling I understand that the classified section is buy at your own risk and I personally have never had any issues. But in reading the feedback thread today I noticed that there has been a few members who have stolen money from member. Received the payment and never sent the item. I was wondering if the MODs would look into warning or banning for this. I think it shows the true side of a person and could be considered trolling to use the SOS classifieds and our large member base as a place to steal from. __________________ תיקבה אמונה אהבה

10-13-2009, 04:17 PM	#2 (permalink)
Brandi “If you want the last word, apologize.” Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 39,594 Blog Entries: 1 Classifieds: (3) Activity: 21% Longevity: 99%	I would be totally on board with warning and/or banning for people who have proven to be problematic. If it's like a one time ordeal and there isn't any proof, that's one thing, and I don't think the mods should have to issue a ban or warning for 1 person's word. But if there are multiple instances, and especially proof, I really do think it should be given HEAVY consideration. I'd even personally support an immediate ban versus 3 separate warnings, if it seems like the person is really a scam artist. Of course on an individual basis for each situation, but I think this may discourage repeat offenders if they are not given a lot of chances. +1 __________________

10-13-2009, 04:18 PM	#3 (permalink)
glass1/2full Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Midwest Gal Posts: 4,063 Classifieds: (0) Activity: 48% Longevity: 28%	I like this. __________________

10-13-2009, 04:18 PM	#4 (permalink)
Kris Finding strength one day at a time Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Suffolk, Virginia Posts: 16,548 Classifieds: (2) Activity: 64% Longevity: 55%	I also agree with this. __________________ Yes I know I am smoking hot

10-13-2009, 04:23 PM	#7 (permalink)
Amber deadliest catch without the crabs. Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: we are in va beach. Posts: 15,218 Blog Entries: 1 Classifieds: (2) Activity: 93% Longevity: 24%	Agree. I would hate to see anyone else lose money, Lord knows we don't make that much. __________________

About Us

MilitarySOS Shortcuts

MilitarySOS Help

About MilitarySOS

10-13-2009, 04:34 PM	#8 (permalink)
blahblahcarnes Kris Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Jacksonville FL Posts: 898 Classifieds: (0) Activity: 11% Longevity: 16%	I aggree __________________

10-13-2009, 04:42 PM	#10 (permalink)
ThatKid MilitarySOS Jewel Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 7,071 Classifieds: (1) Activity: 23% Longevity: 37%	with all of this...there are some that take FULL advantage of this, and should be banned for it. __________________