|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||
|
Red Bull Queen
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Manhattan, Fort Riley, Kansas
Posts: 6,984
Classifieds: (0)
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 36%
|
Clinton vs Obama (last night's debate)
What are your thoughts on this exchange last night?
__________________
~devinn
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Loving My Navy Veteran
![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Great Falls, Montana
Posts: 16,468
Classifieds: (-2)
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 91%
|
Mud slinging, and I'm tired of it. They need to stop fighting each other, and fight for their own political "agenda" so to speak. I want to know what they are going to do to improve our country NOW, not what each person did in their own respective pasts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
BOHICA
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Goodyear, Arizona
Posts: 21,428
Classifieds: (1)
Activity: 84%
Longevity: 42%
|
Well, as for the WalMart thing... Um, not any worse than our Vice President having shares in the company that got billions of dollars of no-bid contracts in the same war he played a big part in starting. Just about everyone in Washington has risen up the corporate ladder in one way or another. Corporations are inherantly evil, so there you go.
As for the Obama slumlord thing. I don't know. I will have to research it. I do think that the coverage on the fight during the debate is being blown up more than it should have been. It was a TWO hour debate and that was the only real heat during it, and it wasn't even that bad. They talked about a lot of other things as well and in a very calm manner. So, I honestly don't see why the media is acting like it was some huge blow-out when it wasn't. Of course, they have announced that the "gloves are coming off" SO many times since campaigning began... I watched a debate where Republicans traded jokes about "islamo-fascists" or whatever the new token slogan is now when talking about foreign policy. At least Obama and Clinton kept the joking to the personal stuff (like the question to Obama about whether or not Bill Clinton was the first "black President").
__________________
![]() Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence. ~ Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
BOHICA
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Goodyear, Arizona
Posts: 21,428
Classifieds: (1)
Activity: 84%
Longevity: 42%
|
__________________
![]() Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence. ~ Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Red Bull Queen
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Manhattan, Fort Riley, Kansas
Posts: 6,984
Classifieds: (0)
Activity: 0%
Longevity: 36%
|
![]() you know what I find SO VERY amusing? That mudslinging such as this from democrats can be excused somehow or another by their supporters...and if the republican debate had contained the EXACT SAME exchange...democratic supporters would have tore it to pieces... ![]() and of course vice versa.
__________________
~devinn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Account Closed
![]() |
And this is why I you Devinn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
BOHICA
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Goodyear, Arizona
Posts: 21,428
Classifieds: (1)
Activity: 84%
Longevity: 42%
|
I guess I don't see actually talking about EXPERIENCE and ISSUES mud slinging.
__________________
![]() Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence. ~ Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Clinton, don't like him... Obama, not a favorite either but the issues that are being called mudslinging are actually documented events if I'm not mistaken. Please correct me if I'm wrong. How can bringing up facts that are relevant to the issues be mudslinging? Now, if they started insinuating that Clinton's womanizing destroyed trust in leaders or that Obama is supposedly a Muslim sent by insurgents to take over from the inside... those are both speculation and therefore (to me) would be considered slinging mud... grasping at straws... etc.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|