Todd and Sarah not agreeing to being questioned

[Aunt Sponge]

Ok -I thought about putting this in venting but figured it might do good for a debate on this type of situation.

I have 2 issues with their stubborn junk:
1) If she didn't do anything wrong then why doesn't she want to just stand up for herself and just get it over with.

2) Excusing it as "left-agenda" or whatever doesn't explain why it's been going on - it didnt' just start after her vetting, it's been going on for a while.

So - as any proper person would do - just go there, get the questioning over with. If you're innocent you'll be found innocent. Why guff

So - so that's my view, erally, when it comes to ANYTHING. If you're wronly accused of doing something then putting off the string of events related to your questioning/investigation just *makes* you look guilty.
I don't see how that's benificial or mature .

[Loretta]

I agree. Completely disregarding the fact I don't like her, she's a government official...if something needs investigated, let 'em investigate if you have nothing to hide!

The whole "left agenda" is a piss-poor excuse. I don't really think anyone believes that?

[goldilockz]

They also have the right to refuse to be questioned.

[EmeraldEyes]

Originally Posted by Aunt Sponge Ok -I thought about putting this in venting but figured it might do good for a debate on this type of situation. I have 2 issues with their stubborn junk: 1) If she didn't do anything wrong then why doesn't she want to just stand up for herself and just get it over with. 2) Excusing it as "left-agenda" or whatever doesn't explain why it's been going on - it didnt' just start after her vetting, it's been going on for a while. So - as any proper person would do - just go there, get the questioning over with. If you're innocent you'll be found innocent. Why guff So - so that's my view, erally, when it comes to ANYTHING. If you're wronly accused of doing something then putting off the string of events related to your questioning/investigation just *makes* you look guilty. I don't see how that's benificial or mature .

I've got a whole article in the news section, but I'm just really upset that they are refusing to testify and ignoring supoenas when they IMO should just get it over with. If they have done nothing wrong, then why stall??

[Wicked]

I agree. That has been a big old red flag to me. What happened to transparent government? The discovery of her private Yahoo e-mail account being used to conduct state business reeks of corruption to me.

I am nervous.

[Christina]

Originally Posted by goldilockz They also have the right to refuse to be questioned.

yes, they do. and we have the right to judge them based on that refusal!

[Aunt Sponge]

That doesn't bother me, the yahoo thing - I don't care.

I think her putting it off is admitting guilt - she's guilty, did things HER way on purpose and is trying to duck out of taking responsibility.

Notice I'm sick of this **** and no longer openly supporting her...She was great, at first, but now nauseates me.

[Wicked]

Originally Posted by goldilockz They also have the right to refuse to be questioned.

Which looks awfully hypocritical when you have been running on a platform of transparent government.

[goldilockz]

Originally Posted by Aunt Sponge That doesn't bother me, the yahoo thing - I don't care. I think her putting it off is admitting guilt - she's guilty, did things HER way on purpose and is trying to duck out of taking responsibility. Notice I'm sick of this **** and no longer openly supporting her...She was great, at first, but now nauseates me.

Maybe she's not ducking out but working on what she's going to say? Maybe she's taking her time so she doesn't mess up or something?

[Loretta]

Originally Posted by goldilockz Maybe she's not ducking out but working on what she's going to say? Maybe she's taking her time so she doesn't mess up or something?

I might buy that if she wasn't under investigation even before she was chosen as VP....

The woman has a problem following the rules.